So interesting thing happened today... I was discussing this year's crop of students with another art teacher in my building and we started talking about our current PD and the idea of increasing rigor and relevance and teaching to the type of students we have in reality(& by extension their use of technology). And it started out the same, the small gripes about administrators don't know / don't appreciate the way art is taught, etc, etc. and that if we are always bouncing from one thing to another (this was from something that was said about the igen's short attention span and inability to pay attention for more than 10 min) we won't be able to teach the valuable skill of focus and seeing. And how that is important to artists' abilities.
For me this conversation reminded me about how I used to feel about the differences between myself and my students. I remember coming straight out of college and realizing how elevated my vocabulary had become. I had to scale way back so that my students were able to understand any sort of discussion. And when we did work in the library (I also helped tutor kids), they were soooo lazy. I couldn't get them to walk over to the shelf to look something up in an encyclopedia, they just wanted to find it on a computer (keep in mind this was 2001 and BG - before google. it was even before Ask Jeeves, one of my personal favorite early search engines). But slowly my attitudes changed. As technology became more available and more widely used, I embraced it. But only for personal use. It was easy to compartmentalize for me because that was the way I had already known school. Then, eventually, I came to accept it as an educational tool. As I transitioned from overhead to led projector, desk top to laptop, disk to jump drive to cloud. How far I've come in really only a little more than 10 years. Its incredible! But I digress...
What I keep thinking about tonight is the comment my colleague made about students wanting to jump to google to look something up instead of just sitting and thinking about it for a while. "How lazy they are!" he said. To which I replied, "But are they? We stop to just think because that's an experience we are familiar with - - where that was the only option as we sat in class. But to our current class of students, it has never been an option to be without google as a solution. Wouldn't we admonish our students if they couldn't problem solve? If that is a real solution, why shouldn't they think of it immediately? Why do we value immediate recall over this ability to problem solve or identify, evaluate, and use resources? For me its just a matter adjusting what we prioritize and value. When we were in school, no one would have chastised us for getting up to use a dictionary or encyclopedia. Then and now, teachers would encourage it. No one would call us lazy for daring to look up something we didn't know in a book. Why do that with a digital, web based resource like google?"
Just something I've been musing on...