Michelle Ridlen's MU Art Ed Blog

Michelle Ridlen's MU Art Ed Blog
Master's Student ~ Started Summer 2012, Anticipated Graduation December 2014 ~ Tiger for Life! M-I-Z...

Friday, June 22, 2012

Research Translation #2

Whoops! Looking over my posts, I realized I never posted my second research translation and it was sitting in my drafts. Here it is, better late than never...

Research Translation #2
Commodity Fetishism: Material Origins of Objects We Love by Elizabeth Garber



RESEARCH PROBLEM 
The research problem is not clearly stated. Partially I believe because of its qualitative nature, and the author's intent to discover what students' reactions and capabilities would be if taught art in a way that focuses not solely on art making, but in looking at and analyzing our material and visual culture. The Author does a good job at laying out previous and corroborating research that directly applies to the issues she is exploring with her class. Since this is a qualitative research project and the variables so many, they are not defined and instead it is presented more as a reflection or case study even.


LITERATURE REVIEW
The research is well organized and supports descriptions from the events that happened in class. It also nicely supports the decision and desire to teach this type of lesson. The sources are mostly from the last 15 years, with a few from the last 30 that still seem to be very relevant and informed the more current sources. The research sources are of course secondary, but the case study is a primary source outlining what is like to teach students material culture through the analysis of objects.    


RESEARCH QUESTIONS or HYPOTHESES
No, the hypothesis / question was not stated clearly. It was more of a reflection on an experience and then also reflections on the indications of the outcome. 


DATA SOURCES/SAMPLING  
Again, the data source was not clearly described. The article is more concerned with outling the project, the way it was taught, what the students examined, and the outcome. The author also reflected on what she deemed to be a successful lesson. The author did not describe what type of class this was, how many students participated, or even age group. 


MEASUREMENT TOOLS 
The author used student artwork to analyze the data as well as classroom observations. 


METHODOLOGY/PROCEDURES 
The author was very descriptive in laying out the lesson and what students did as they studied material culture and their objects. She clearly shared her questions that she presented to her students and some examples of how they answered them. There wasn't a wrap up at the end of whether she felt a certain percentage of students were successful or any information on how this project would inform future teachings of this lesson.


RESULTS 
Since the research was more about observing results of a new teaching method, there were not specific research questions to be answered other that "what happens when students investigate personal objects as a part of a material culture?" The case study was an interesting read and it would be interesting to read more about how this would carry forth into future projects.


DISCUSSION 
Reading about this current type of teaching method is interesting and relevant in the discussion of where art education in the 21st century is moving. Examples like this help build a case for curriculums to be developed broadening the scope of how we teach art and visual culture, not just continuing to focus on media, elements & principles.  For me this article will be beneficial to future research and a good place to refer for additional sources to investigate as I move forward with evolving my curriculum and lessons.

Thursday, June 21, 2012



Killing Creativity


Behaviors/Attitudes which can "kill" creativity might include:

  • Insisting that children do things the “right way”.  Teaching a child to think that there is just one right way to do things kills the urge to try new ways.
  • Pressuring children to be realistic, to stop imagining.  When we label a child’s flights of fantasy as “silly”, we bring the child down to earth with a thud, causing the inventive urge to curl up and die.
  • Making comparisons with other children.  This is a subtle pressure on a child to conform; yet the essence of creativity is freedom to conform or not to conform.
  • Discouraging children’s curiosity.  One of the surest indicators of creativity is curiosity; yet we often brush questions aside because we are too busy for “silly” questions.  Children’s questions deserve respect.
  • Avoid responding to a child’s desire for more information in an area of interest.  Similarly, avoid support a child’s desire for training/growth in an area of talent/interest.
  • Avoid exposing children to new experiences (sights, sounds, smells, tastes, etc.)  Keep their world small and mono-experiential.
  • Model the fear-of-trying-something-new.  Risk taking is a valuable part of the creative experience. 
  • Demonstrate a narrow-mindedness towards the world around you – literature, current events, religion, culture, etc.
  • Demonstrate a lack of mental and/or emotional flexibility.  Reject out-of-hand varying perspectives and view points without considering them first.   


Sunday, June 17, 2012

Annotated Bibliography


Annotated Bibliography

In switching my topic and research question, what I have discovered is that I feel pretty clueless where to start or how to hone in my research (I’ve also discovered my formal researching skills are pretty rusty.) [New research question: How does an art teacher's room reflect his/her teaching philosophy? Hmmm, or should it be DOES an art teacher's room reflect his/her teaching philosophy? This too probably needs some refining]

Starting research for my bibliography, I began with sources that may enlighten me to the language of semiotics and to how to define art teacher “philosophies”.  So I began with sources that Dr. Pinnow had mentioned, hoping they will give me more insight into this fascinating language. This might be some heavy reading, but will hopefully be very interesting.

1.   Gunther Kress, Theo van Leeuwen (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design
Reading Images builds on its reputation as the first systematic and comprehensive account of the grammar of visual design. Drawing on an enormous range of examples from children's drawings to textbook illustrations, photo-journalism to fine art, as well as three-dimensional forms such as sculpture and toys, the authors examine the ways in which images communicate meaning. Features include:
- new material on moving images and on colour
- a discussion of how images and their uses have changed through time
- websites and web-based images
- ideas on the future of visual communication.
Reading Images focuses on the structures or 'grammar' of visual design – colour, perspective, framing and composition – provides the reader with an invaluable 'tool-kit' for reading images and makes it a must for anyone interested in communication, the media and the arts.


2.   Gunther Kress, Theo van Leeuwen (2001) Multimodal Discourse.
Multimodal Discourse outlines a new theory of communication for the age of interactive multimedia. Kress and Van Leeuwen show how two kinds of thought processes interact in the design and production of communicative messages: "design thinking" and "production thinking," the kind of thinking which occurs in direct interaction with the materials and media used. This book will be a key text in courses of language, media and communication willing to take on the theoretical challenges posed by multimodality, mulitmedia and multi-skilling, and it provides inspiring theoretical input for courses in interactive multimedia design.


3.   Gunther Kress (2009) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication.
 The 21st century is awash with ever more mixed and remixed images, writing, layout, sound, gesture, speech, and 3D objects. Multimodality looks beyond language and examines these multiple modes of communication and meaning making.
Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication represents a long-awaited and much anticipated addition to the study of multimodality from the scholar who pioneered and continues to play a decisive role in shaping the field. Written in an accessible manner and illustrated with a wealth of photos and illustrations to clearly demonstrate the points made, Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication deliberately sets out to locate communication in the everyday, covering topics and issues not usually discussed in books of this kind, from traffic signs to mobile phones.

I also decided I should look at what areas might define a teacher’s philosophy and the history of art education that may inform current teaching styles and methods.

1.   G. James Daichendt (2010)
Artist-Teacher: A Philosophy for Creating and Teaching 
Is an artist-teacher a mere professional who balances a career—or does the duality of making and teaching art merit a more profound investigation? Rejecting a conventional understanding of the artist-teacher, this book sets out to present a robust history from the classical era to the twenty-first century. Particular pedagogical portraits—featuring George Wallis, Walter Gropius, Johannes Itten, Victor Pashmore, Richard Hamilton, Arthur Wesley Dow, and Hans Hoffmann—illustrate the artist-teacher in various contexts. This book offers a revelation of the complex thinking processes artists utilize when teaching, and a reconciliation of the artistic and educational enterprises as complimentary partners.


2.   Jane K. Bates (2000) Becoming an Art Teacher
This book introduces the student to the field of teaching, discusses theory and practice of Art Education, and synthesizes and prepares students to make the transition from student to Art teacher. It presents art education as an integration of philosophy, history, theory, and practice. Bates illustrates how to apply theory to practice as an art educator. Models, methods, and experiences are provided to enlighten, inspire, and amuse.



3.   Mary Stankiewicz (2001). Roots of Art Education Practice (Art Education in Practice Series) Weaving together accepted ideas about art, children, and schooling, the author tells the story of art education practice a century ago. Readers will gain insights into the circumstances under which curricular practices originated, and will better appreciate the beliefs that shape art education today.


4.   Arthur D. Efland (1989) A History of Art Education: Intellectual and Social Currents in Teaching the Visual Arts. Recent debates on the place of the arts in American life has refocused attention on art education in schools. In this book, the author puts current debate and concerns in a well-researched historical perspective. He examines the institutional settings of art education throughout Western history, the social forces that have shaped it and the evolution and impact of alternate streams of influence on present practice. The book treats the visual arts in relation to developments in general education and particular emphasis is placed on the 19th and 20th centuries and on the social context that has affected our concept of art today. The book is intended as a main text in history of art education courses, as a supplemental text in courses in art education methods and history of education, and as a resource for students, professors and researchers.


5.   Stuart MacDonald (1970) The History and Philosophy of Art Education. Dr. Macdonald investigates the continuous developments of Art and Design education in Italy, France, Britain, Germany, and the United States. The study traces the philosophies of teachers from the age of the guilds and the academies to today, and sets them in the context of the general education theories of their times. Stuart Macdonald clarifies the whole field of art education for research and teaching purposes. He points out that the knowledge of the principles and methods of art education is essential for a true understanding of the art of different periods. He makes clear that art education should be studied within the existing education disciplines of history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology of education. Essentially factual, using many quotations from primary sources not generally available, this book gives a disciplined grounding in a branch of the history of education, and describes the philosophies which continue to govern courses in Art and Design.


Then I began looking at some research that looks into effect of the environment of schools on performance –

6.   Pamela Woolnera, Elaine Halla*, Steve Higginsa, Caroline McCaugheya & Kate Walla (2007)
A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for Building Schools for the Future
Oxford Review of Education, Volume 33, Issue 1, pages 47-70.
This paper reports on a literature review conducted in the UK for the Design Council and CfBT (Higgins et al., 2005) which looked at the evidence of the impact of environments on learning in schools. We have reviewed the available evidence regarding different facets of the physical environment and provided an analysis based on different areas of effect, including the extent to which different facets interact (positively and negatively) with one another. Our conclusions suggest that, although the research often indicates the parameters of an effective environment, there is an overall lack of empirical evidence about the impact of individual elements of the physical environment which might inform school design at a practical level to support student achievement. However, at a secondary level of analysis, there are indications that environmental change can be part of a catalytic process of school development and improvement. The implications of these findings for Building Schools for the Future will be discussed.

7.   Metzger, Richard L.; Boschee, Pamela F.; Haugen, Terry; Schnobrich, Barbara L.
The classroom as learning context: Changing rooms affects performance.
Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 71(4), Aug 1979, 440-442. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.440 Studied the role of the classroom as a context that can affect memory, using a multiple time-series design. Two classes of 25 undergraduates each were given weekly quizzes in their regular classroom over a baseline period, were moved to a different room on separate target weeks, and finally were returned to their classroom. Moving had a significant deleterious effect, particularly on students doing well in the course. (8 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)


8.   Carol S. Weinstein (1979)
The Physical Environment of the School: A Review of the Research REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Fall 1979 vol. 49 no. 4 577-610
This paper reviews research on the impact of classroom environments on student behavior, attitudes, and achievement. The first section examines studies of six environmental variables: seating position, classroom design, density, privacy, noise, and the presence or absence of windows. In the second part of the paper, research conducted from an “ecological” perspective is considered. A third section focuses on the effects of open space school designs. Finally, some future directions for research are discussed, and the advantages and limitations of various research designs are summarized.


Lastly, I discovered an interesting research article on educational semiotics and looking at field studies in France. (PESCE, S. (2011), Institutional Pedagogy and Semiosis: Investigating the missing link between Peirce's semiotics and effective semiotics. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43: 1145–1160. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00633.x) This led me to look further into these resources, hoping they might be of use. I was not able to move forward in finding them in order to read them, but wanted to include them here as a possible next step.

Cunningham, D. J. (1987) Outline of an Educational Semiotic, The American Journal of Semiotics, 5:2, Special Issue, ‘Semiotics and Education’, pp. 210–216.

Deely, J. (2004) Semiotics and Jakob von Uexküll's Concept of Umwelt, Sign System Studies, 32:1/2, pp. 11–34.

Manning, P. K. (1987) Semiotics and Fieldwork, Qualitative Research Methods Volume 7 (Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications).

McHoul, A. (1996) Semiotic Investigations. Towards an effective semiotics (Lincoln, NE, University of Nebraska Press).

McLaren, P. (1989) Life in Schools. An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education (Boston, Allyn & Bacon).

Shank, G. (1995) Semiotics and Qualitative Research in Education: The third crossroad, The Qualitative Report, 2:3. Available at: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-3/shank.html

Stables, A. (2006) Living and Learning as Semiotic Engagement: A new theory of education (New York, Edwin Mellen Press).

Tochon, F.V. (2002) Semiotic Consciousness in Education: An introduction, International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 3:2, pp. 3–8.

I definitely feel like my research has been too broad and I need to figure out the language for what exactly it is I’m trying to look into. This may take a question and answer session with Kathy and/or class members. 

Monday, June 11, 2012

JULY 20, 2012

Thought I'd throw this on here for anyone following closely enough.... Might be interesting.


Art Teachers
Mark Your Calendars
Come to an “Artrageous” Affair
July 20, 2012
3:00 pm

MAEA members and non-MAEA members alike--- Meet at Flatbranch Brewery Friday July 20th for an informal afternoon of sharing ideas, interacting, and socialization.
This get-together open to all. Any art teacher is welcome. Help spread the word. We can show them how much fun we have.

At 6:00, Join the public for one of Columbia Art Leagues “Artageous Friday’s”
Visit the downtown Galleries, Shops, and Museums

Sunday, June 10, 2012

Ch. 7 Homework - Preparing the Working Proposal

Mindwork: Create a Timeline
(I am hoping at this point we do not need to have a detailed calendar version of our timeline like the example in the book. Yikes! I just got out for the summer and I'm feeling overwhelmed with tasks for the school year.)


Summer - Develop research proposal, check out grant possibilities, gather bibliographic materials. Research more information about 21st century skills, other teachers use of iPad technology in secondary art rooms, and assessment methods.


July - Book study. Building PD development. iPad lab set ups. Technology PD session. CCSS PD workshops. Content Leader meetings.


August - Begin School Year Aug 1 / class Aug 6.
Survey students. Begin journal. Implement iPad strategies. Take Field Notes.
Check on progress of 6 curriculum writing teams. Begin Committee review process.
Plan and hold 2 building PD days.
Start online coursework for Fall semester.
Oh, yeah and plan lessons and teach classes.


September - Breathe. Progress reports due.
Continue to implement iPad strategies. Continue field notes. Interview selected students. Keep reading and researching relevant connected topics.
Keep track of curriculum writing teams and committee review process. Start to look for PEH curriculum writing teams and begin selecting days for writing institute.


October - 1st Q ends, grades due. Fall Break. Parent / Teacher conferences.
Monitor strategies. Go over field notes.
Follow up with Curriculum writing teams. Begin constructing budget for following fiscal year.


November -
Continue strategies. Gather more information about research topics.
Thanksgiving.
Curriculum committee meetings.
Cognitive Coaching Workshop.


December -
Follow up interviews. Survey students.
Finals review. Exams.
Finalize Budget for submittal.


January - Start 2nd semester.
Compile Data. Determine if should continue or gather different information. Begin to analyze. Outline research study based on themes.
Reexamine Curriculum timelines. Outline remaining work.
Submit proposal for MAEA presentation.
Begin Spring semester online coursework.


February - Progress reports due.
Birthday. Plan D's bday.
Evaluate progress. Draft presentation of research.
Begin MAEA presentation work.


March - 3rd Q ends. P/T conferences. Spring Break.
State and National Conferences. Present MAEA.
Prepare Taxes. Send invites for D's bday.


April - status update.
D's Bday. Plan G's bday.
MAP testing. Block schedule.


Mindwork: Find a Grant Source (pgs. 110-111)

Source: National Endowment for the Arts
http://arts.endow.gov/grants/apply/Artsed.html#

Learning: Americans of all ages acquire knowledge or skills in the arts.
Support is available for projects that provide Americans of all ages with arts learning opportunities across a diverse spectrum of artistic disciplines and geographic locations. These projects should focus on the acquisition of knowledge or skills in the arts, thereby building public capacity for lifelong participation in the arts. Learning activities may include:
  • Lifelong learning activities for children, adults, and intergenerational groups.
  • Standards-based arts education activities for pre-K-12 students.
  • Informal education programs, workshops, and demonstrations.
  • Mentorships and apprenticeship programs.
  • Professional development for artists, teaching artists, teachers, and other education providers.
  • Assessments and evaluations of arts learning.
  • Online courses or training.
  • Lectures and symposia.
  • Production, publication, and distribution of teachers'/facilitators’ guides.
  • Innovative practices in arts learning for Americans of all ages.
You will be asked to address the anticipated results in your application. If you receive a grant, you will be asked to provide evidence of those results at the end of your project. You will need to describe the participants' learning, the composition of the participant group, and the numbers of participants and activities, as well as the activities used to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge or skills in the arts. If you receive support through the Arts Education discipline for a standards-based project, you will be required to report on additional measurable results, including identifying specific learning outcomes, describing the assessment method, and reporting on the number of participants who demonstrated learning. Before applying, please review the reporting requirements for Learning. In addition to a Final Descriptive Report and Federal Financial Report, Arts Education grantees will be required to submit assessment tools with their Final Report.



Mindwork: Write a Working Proposal (pg. 111)
Working Title: Bauhaus Meets Big Idea

Name, affiliation, position: Michelle Ridlen, Francis Howell School District, Artist Teacher / Fine Arts Content Leader

Background (position, purpose, significance, rationale): Teacher, Curriculum Content Leader. teaching through the years I have felt a shift in culture and witnessed the slow evolution of the 21st century student into a learner who is not as responsive to DBAE-based learning in the secondary art room.
Problem Statement: Motivation for today's learners has changed. Artistic habits of mind are needed now more than ever to be a successful 21st century citizen and the structure of the current curriculum is not as effective at reaching our students.

Research Question and subquestions: Could an alternative curriculum encourage and produce more productive students that demonstrate a higher level of creativity and critical thinking skills?

Related Research: Creativity, Digital learners, curriculum types, assessment

List of Permissions Required: I am not sure what type of permissions would be required to research this topic. I assume parent/student as discussed earlier in the book, but is there also a more formal request process?

Data Sources: Selected case study students, interviews, field notes, artwork, portfolios.

Methods and Analysis: Qualitative methods as well as some quantitative data related to grades.

Time Line: (please see previous post)

Plans for Dissemination: Either a follow up presentation at MAEA to last year's Big Idea presenation, or outline of alternative curriculum in the form of a sketchbook / artworks in an online gallery.

Possible Findings: Splitting the school year into an elements / principles type structure no longer fits the needs of our student population in order to address 21st century needs in visual arts education. There is a better way to engage students and keep them engaged in the arts.

Projected Budget: I could work on a shoestring budget of my pocket change, but could also make use of technology to enrich the envisioned curriculum. (If I could get my own iPad lab through a grant, that would be awesome!) Digital photo equipment, lighting, and a laptop or iPad dedicated to my classroom for our use would be ideal. Also, if I could pay college types to observe, take notes, and transcribe notes/data that would also be incredibly useful.

Research Translation 1


RESEARCH TRANSLATION 1:
Digital Journals: The Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Portfolios for Visual Culture Learners
Shei-Chau Wang

SUMMARIZE the article (500 words)
With the rapid development of technology in the 21st century, art educators are faced with challenges in how to teach students to interpret the world of visual images around them. To sufficiently assess students in the visual arts, portfolio development is suggested by research to be efficient at measuring student development. In combination, it is the art teacher’s responsibility to present a holistic worldview and integrate the use of digital media and technology into the learning experience. The creation of an e-portfolio for use in assessment is the author’s solution to this.


RESEARCH PROBLEM:
The rapid change and development in technology has changed the way people look at the world and caused conflict between the old and the new social value systems, including amongst art educators.
The problem is stated clearly and upfront in the article, with discussion of how this issue affects art educators. The variables in this case seem to be how technology is changing during the study, but these are clearly laid out for the reader. 


LITERATURE REVIEW
In this case, the problem is tied closely to issues of assessment as well as providing students in art a holistic worldview in their curriculum. The review of previous research cites these issues in a well-organized and logical manner. The cited sources are beneficial to understanding the progression of thought of the author in the development of the research. Although, the precursory research is at first nebulous, the connection becomes clear as the discussion of assessment is connected to the idea of an evolved portfolio in the form of an e-portfolio. The sources are current with references to many sources from the last 15 years. It would be important for this research to have current sources, as the subject is the rapid development of technology and today’s modern learner so it would need some documentation of current practices to support this hypothesis. The literature review uses secondary sources to support its development. Later in the research, primary sources are cited in the analyzation of digital technology as a tool for portfolio development.


RESEARCH QUESTIONS or HYPOTHESES
How should art teachers embrace the challenge of rapidly changing and evolving technology? To what extent are art educators capable of employing the multifunctional, highly efficient, and virtual characteristics of high-tech products to better their teaching and learning? 
Although this topic is interesting and relevant, it seems in my untrained research mind, to imply that the research will survey multiple art teachers. Not just present one option and document that usage. In fact, if I am reading this article correctly, it is not stating a hypothesis or supposition about the outcome. It is only stating one example of a way that a teacher may embrace technology in order to better learning. So either the research is confusing, or more likely, it is presenting a type of research that I am unfamiliar with and that I am trying to fit into my known definition of what research is. 
The research is documenting one teacher's method for employing multifunctional, highly efficient, and virtual characteristics of high-tech products to better their teaching and learning.  It does not state to guess whether or not the e-portfolio will better a student's learning or teacher's instruction, but does say that the portfolio will better assess student learning of a modern day student. This practice of reflection through the development of learning can in turn improve student learning, but this aspect is not discussed in the research.


DATA SOURCES/SAMPLING  
The author conducted his study during 7 years of teaching college level art and design classes. He does not give a number of subjects, or population. He does not give this information until the end, after describing the processes of his case studies. He seems to be documenting two aspects, the how to employ technology and how it changes, but his question, to me, is also asking about the outcome of implementing this technique (e-portfolio), which he does not address.


MEASUREMENT TOOLS 
The author does not seem to be measuring data, but rather recording procedure and development. Or if measurements were taken to record progress, they were not shared. It would have been interesting to see a measurement of students perceived learned skills before and after e-portfolio implementation.


METHODOLOGY/PROCEDURES
The author is very good about describing the tools and methods used to create e-portfolios at different periods of time. The author describes the evolution of the technology available for e-portfolio creation and its limitations for the art classroom of the time. He discusses the progress and the difference in implementation for his students. The important information I find to be missing is the piece that documents the student understanding of his/her learning and therefore if this tool (portfolios created through high-tech products) is a better way of learning. Not enough discussion of the student reflection or the instructor's ability to assess or gauge student development.


RESULTS
The results are very clear in the conclusion, with a list bulleting what has been learned from the research. I don't believe that the question was really answered, maybe explored further, but not answered definitively. The author was describing and documenting the implementation of one method of utilizing high-tech methods to better teaching and learning. Very little was discussed until the end, when one sentence mentions that students reflected back on their experience saying that it was beneficial and they could see their own growth and development.   


DISCUSSION 
The conclusion relates back to the hypothesis in that it outlines student development to show growth in both areas of artistic development and use of technology to facilitate learning.  The conclusions also presents issues for further consideration in the area of e-portfolios and engaging high-tech methods for better student learning. This seems to be relevant in a world where high-tech solutions are popular and increasing. Not only popular, but being developed in curriculums and encouraged in standards. 

Friday, June 8, 2012

Ch. 5 Legwork & Ch. 6 Methods & Methodologies

Mindwork: Combine Data from Multiple Sources (pg. 80)

I think I should also include data from these sources:

  • Student artwork
  • Student Histories
  • Interviews


Mindwork for chapter 6. Unable to complete with class out of session.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Ch. 4 Headwork: Assuming Self and Other

Mindwork: Explore the Emic (stepping in) and the Etic (stepping out) (pg. 55)

  • In my classroom I did this when I looked around and thought about my students seeming to bored with art. Not sure if bored is the right word, b/c I tried to make projects interesting and appealing and they weren't bored per say. But I guess we were just missing some electricity. I'm speaking here of my Introduction to Art classes. You see, I was comparing them to my Printmaking classes where we were experimenting and everyone was up working unguided, collaborating - - truly engaged in the creative process. And I wanted that in my Intro classes, b/c that was the magic of art! ( & The sense of community and family in this environment was mind blowing!) If I wanted these students to have a life long connection to art, I thought, I need to recreate that type of experience.  
  • So, How do I do that? I had worked really hard in the beginning to make art less mysterious, make it less abstract, more concrete so those non-artist linear types could follow and be successful. But what I intuitively realized then and am actually realizing now, is that mystery and that abstract-ness is what makes art unique, and special, and magical. And when people tune into that and click, that's when their connection to art is made. So what I strived to do was life that veil, let them in on the secret, help my students understand that abstractness and get dirty in a fun way while doing it. 
  • But how does this apply to my question topic? Well, I don't think I could move into that as easily if I hadn't already started looking at these type of questions. It seems a natural progression to go from teaching with Big Ideas and concepts to figuring out a better way to evaluate them, and how to enrich their expereience and work collaboratively with technology and digital communities.



Mindwork: Use the Three Questions for Analysis (pgs. 56 -57)


  • Surprises, Intrigues, Disturbs
     I'm surprised at how important this seems, and how if I can just crack this, maybe all the art instruction mysteries will be solved. But on the other hand, although I find this important for me to discover and work on and develop, and how much I want to do it, it lacks a certain...hmm...a certain sexiness to it. I really want to engage the last product in some thing that doesn't feel like a chore, or a paper, or curriculum document...but yet is useful to others. I guess I'm conflicted. My two sides are wrestling for attention.

Mindwork: State Your Ethics (pg. 66)


Based on the ALA ethics statements, as found here: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/proethics/codeofethics/codeethics

  1. We provide the highest level of service to all art room users through appropriate and useful aesthetic resources
  2. We uphold the principles of intellectual freedom and resist all efforts to censor artistic creation
  3. We respect intellectual property rights and advocate balance between the interests of creators seeking appropriation and rights holders.
  4. We treat students, co-workers and other colleagues with respect, fairness, and good faith, and advocate conditions of employment that safeguard the rights and welfare of all.
  5. We do not advance private interests at the expense of the learner, colleagues, or our employing institutions
  6. We strive for excellence in the profession by maintaining and enhancing our own knowledge and skills, by encouraging the professional development of co-workers, and by fostering the aspirations of potential artists and lifelong art lovers.


Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Ch. 3 Bridgework

Mindwork: Discover What You Know (pgs. 34-35)

  • I've been looking a bit at the two big topics my questions are geared around - technology in the art room (specifically iPad use) and alternative curriculum options including different ways to assess students. I'm not sure how familiar with journals I really am. I read the NAEA publication, but I don't necessarily read studies. 


Mindwork: Google-ography (pgs. 38-39)

  • Its funny, but I have kind of been using pinterest to track my searches  and findings on these topics. 
  • Okay, I completely just lost hours of time searching the internet on my topic... I think this will link up to my pin boards on pinterest if you want to see them... Let me know if it doesn't work. =) 
  • http://pinterest.com/mdridlen/ 


Mindwork: Shape Your Work Bibliography (pg 45)

  • I need some more books I think. And maybe more scholarly research on this topic, journals, et

Ch. 2 Scratchwork

Mindwork: Explore Trial Questions (p.25-26)

  • Can iPads increase artistic production?
  • Is there a way to integrate iPads into a new evaluative assessment?
  • Can technology be used to create an authentic summative performance assessment? (as well as pre- & mid-)
  • Is there a better way to teach artistic habits of mind?
  • Can the convergence of material & digital assessment methods yield a more authentic performance assessment?
  • Does the traditional A-Z grading method reinforce a less productive and less creative culture in the art room?
  • In what ways does reflective practice: a) create a more authentic artistic practice  b) increase metacognition of students?
  • In what ways can reading & writing be integrated seamlessly  into an authentic artistic practice?
  • How does R&W reinforce artistic practice as opposed to take away from developing artistic skills / habits?


Mindwork: Position Yourself in Relation to the Question (p.27-28)

  • My generational differences may play a part in how I approach this topic. I am looking for ways to elevate  student 21st century skills as well as technology & media literacy skills. I need to make sure that I don't emit biases for a preference for either material or digital tools so that both seem like viable options. Also, if I am looking at how students are assessed, I need to make sure that all students are assessed fairly wiithout bias.

Mindwork: Refine Your Question (p. 31)

Problem Statement(s) - 
  • Students do not place importance on the development of skills in a gradual development of abilities, connecting the experiences from one project to the next.  
  • Student work does not show a deep understanding of anything more than a cursory level of media abilities. 
  • Student work lacks depth of content, therefore students are disconnected from the artistic process and authentic learning experiences. 
  • Students place too much importance on the end letter grade and not on the actual learning taking place.

Research Question(s) - 
  • Would a different type of assessment increase student achievement? 
  • Would a different type of assessment connect students to the artistic process and habits of mind?
  • Would a different type of assessment develop 21st century skills such as creativity, critical thinking, collaboration and communication?
  • Do students need to develop artistic habits of mind to be better prepared for teh 21st century?
  • Do artistic habits of mind teach 21st century skills in a way that can be assessed?